Construct dropped kerb and drive
24 Watnall Road
Nuthall Nottinghamshire NG16 1DU
Councillors J Owen and Councillor P
Bales
requested that this proposal come before Committee.
There were no late items.
Two public speakers, Mr Michael
Chamberlain, applicant, and Councillor Andrew
Cooper, Ward Councillor, made representation to the
Committee before the general debate.
The Committee noted all the information
pertaining to the application. The
debate focused on the suitability of the proposed application, its
location outside of the green belt and other properties with a
similar development in the immediate area.
RESOLVED that planning
permission be approved subject to the following conditions:
- The development hereby permitted
shall be commenced before the expiration of three years beginning
with the date of this permission.
Reason: To comply
with S91 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 as amended by
S51 of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004.
- The development hereby permitted
shall be carried out in accordance with the Site Location Plan
(1:1250) received by the Local Planning Authority on 2 December
2025 and in accordance with the Block Plan (1:200) received by the
Local Planning Authority on 22 December 2025. Reason: For the
avoidance of doubt.
- The driveway shall not be brought
into use until a dropped vehicular footway crossing is available
for use. Reason: In the interests of highway safety in accordance
with Policy 17 of the Part 2 Local Plan 2019.
- The driveway shall not be brought
into use until the drive and any parking or turning areas are
surfaced in a hard-bound material (not loose gravel) for a minimum
of 5.5 metres behind the Highway boundary. The surfaced drives and
any parking or turning areas shall then be maintained in such
hard-bound material for the life of the development. Reason: in the
interests of highway safety in accordance with Policy 17 of the
Part 2 Local Plan 2019.
- The driveway shall not be brought
into use until the access driveway / parking / turning areas are
constructed with provision to prevent the unregulated discharge of
surface water onto the public highway in accordance with details
first submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning
Authority. The provision to prevent the unregulated discharge of
surface water to the public highway shall thereafter be retained
for the life of the development. Reason: To ensure surface water
from the site is not deposited on the public highway causing
dangers to road users, in the interests of highway safety in
accordance with Policy 17 of the Part 2 Local Plan 2019.
- Prior to above ground works
commencing, a landscaping scheme shall be submitted to and approved
by the Local Planning Authority. This scheme shall include the
following details:
(a) trees, hedges and
shrubs to be removed or retained during the
course of development;
(b) numbers, types, sizes
and positions of any proposed trees or shrubs;
(c) proposed hard
surfacing treatment including a plan to show the extent; and,
(d) details including
location of any boundary enclosures
The approved scheme shall
be carried out strictly in accordance with the agreed details.
Reason: No such details
were submitted and to ensure that the details are satisfactory in
the interests of the appearance of the area and in accordance with
the aims of Policy 17 of the Broxtowe Local Plan Part 2 (2019) and
Policy 10 of the Aligned Core Strategy (2014).
- No development shall take place
until details of the existing and proposed land levels across the
site, including any retaining walls that may be required, have been
submitted and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority.
There shall be no variation in these levels without the written
approval of the Local Planning Authority. Reason: In the interests
of the appearance of the area in accordance with Policy 17 of the
Part 2 Local Plan (2019).
(Having declared a non-pecuniary,
non-registrable interest Councillor J Couch left the meeting and
did not vote thereon.)
(Having declared a non-pecuniary,
non-registrable interest Councillor A Cooper did not vote
thereon.)